Los Angeles Grand Jury Investigation Attorneys
A grand jury is a group of people who hear evidence and determine whether enough evidence exists to bring criminal charges against an individual.
Grand juries are made up of 23–25 citizens from the community where the case is being heard, and they meet regularly in a courtroom. The grand jury usually meets for one week at a time, although they may meet longer if necessary.
The grand jury hears evidence presented by prosecutors and occasionally defense attorneys. They also hear testimony from witnesses and are shown other evidence that may be presented by both sides. After hearing all the arguments and viewing the evidence, the grand jury decides whether enough evidence exists to return an indictment against an individual.
If you have been subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury, you may be feeling overwhelmed and unsure of what to do next. This is a very serious matter and should not be taken lightly. You should seek the advice of an experienced attorney at Werksman Jackson & Quinn LLP who will help you navigate this difficult process.
The function of a grand jury is to investigate crimes that have been reported to it by law enforcement agencies. The members of this group may question witnesses and victims, review the evidence and other information, and decide whether sufficient evidence exists to charge someone with committing a crime. If they decide enough evidence exists, they will issue a no bill (or no true bill) against the person being investigated for his or her alleged involvement in criminal activity; if they decide that enough evidence exists for the prosecution, they will issue an indictment against him or her.
Grand juries are frequently constituted to sit for a length of time rather than for a specific case. This is in contrast to the juries in criminal or civil cases, which serve just for that particular trial. Grand juries might thus hear a number of indictment cases at this time.
A federal grand jury is a group of 16 to 23 citizens who are selected by the court to hear evidence presented by the prosecution and decide whether enough evidence exists to charge someone with a crime. Federal grand juries are required to have members who fairly represent the community in which the case will be heard. They are therefore chosen at random from federal jury lists, which is the same process for selecting California grand juries.
Only the following individuals are permitted to attend the proceeding: the jury members themselves, government lawyers (federal prosecutors), any witnesses being cross-examined, any interpreters required, and court reporters.
In a typical trial, the district attorney provides the jury with evidence to persuade them that the criminal suspect committed the crime at hand. This proof could consist of sworn statements from witnesses, written materials, tangible items or other evidence, and transcripts of depositions.
With one significant exception, California grand juries must abide by the same evidence rules as California criminal trials.
The one exception is that, in an indictment case, the hearsay rule does not apply to a law enforcement officer's sworn evidence about a statement another person made outside of court if the officer either possesses five years of experience working in law enforcement or has successfully completed a course on investigating, reporting, and testifying at preliminary hearings.
The jury has no requirement to hear any defense witness testimony. However, they have the authority to require the production of any evidence they have reason to believe tends to indicate the defendant is innocent.
If you are in a grand jury case, it is important to know that you have Werksman Jackson & Quinn LLP on your side. Our attorneys have extensive experience with grand jury cases and can help you navigate this difficult process. We make sure that your rights are protected at every turn and we fight to protect your reputation. Call us today at (213) 688-0460.
Recent Case Results
- Complete Dismissal of Molestation Charges
Attorney Mark Werksman’s 29 year old client was falsely accused of molesting two neighborhood children and was subsequently charged with felony child molestation, with a significant prison sentence hanging over his head should he be convicted. Instead, at the preliminary hearing Werksman was able to convince the court to grant his client a complete dismissal of any charges.
- Decision Set Aside
Client, a college student in a faulty Title IX case, was awarded $130,000 in attorney fees.
- Probation with No Jail Time for Drug Money Laundering Charge
Wilmington man accused in New York federal court of laundering drug money through the sale of laptop computers. Mark was able to get the case transferred to federal court in Los Angeles, where he convinced the United States Attorney to reduce the charges. His client was sentenced to probation with no jail time on a misdemeanor conviction.