Money Laundering Charges and Asset Forfeiture in Los Angeles: What You Need to Know
Money laundering is aggressively prosecuted in California. In many cases, the government moves to seize assets, freeze accounts, and disrupt financial activity long before a case reaches trial. If you are facing asset forfeiture, you are dealing with two legal battles at once: defending against criminal accusations and protecting what you own.
The experienced Los Angeles money laundering defense lawyers at Werksman Jackson & Quinn LLP won’t back down to anyone when it comes to protecting your rights, your assets, and your freedom.
What Are Money Laundering Charges?
Money laundering involves financial transactions designed to conceal the origin, ownership, or control of funds linked to unlawful activity. These cases are often built on tracing patterns of financial transactions rather than providing direct evidence of wrongdoing.
Under California Law: Penal Code § 186.10, money laundering charges may be brought when:
- A person conducts financial transactions involving proceeds of unlawful activity
- The total value exceeds statutory thresholds within a specific timeframe
How Asset Forfeiture Fits into Money Laundering Cases
One of the most aggressive tools used in these investigations is asset forfeiture. Prosecutors may pursue asset seizures to cut off access to funds and apply pressure early in the legal process. In many situations, these assets are seized before a conviction, and sometimes before formal charges are even filed.
Assets that are commonly targeted include:
- Cash and bank accounts
- Real estate holdings
- Business accounts and revenue streams
- Vehicles and luxury items
- Cryptocurrency wallets and digital assets
Criminal Forfeiture vs Civil Forfeiture
Understanding the distinction between criminal forfeiture and civil forfeiture is essential when facing these actions.
Criminal Forfeiture:
- Tied directly to a criminal case
- Requires a conviction before assets are permanently forfeited
- Focuses on property connected to the alleged offense
Civil Forfeiture
- Filed as a separate legal proceeding against the property itself
- Does not require a criminal conviction
- Uses a lower burden of proof (often “preponderance of the evidence”)
Legal Thresholds That Prosecutors Must Meet
Despite the aggressive nature of forfeiture, the government must still meet specific legal standards.
In criminal cases:
- Prosecutors must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
- They must establish that the assets are tied to the alleged offense
Recent Enforcement Trends in Los Angeles
Southern California has become a focal point for financial crime enforcement, with authorities increasingly targeting several types of transactions. These trends highlight the importance of having a defense team that understands both the legal and financial complexities of these cases.
Structured Transactions
Breaking up large financial transactions into smaller amounts to avoid reporting requirements is a common allegation in money laundering cases. But not all structured transactions are unlawful, and intent is often disputed.
Cryptocurrency Investigations
Digital assets are now a major focus. Law enforcement agencies are pursuing cases involving:
- Cryptocurrency exchanges
- Digital wallets
- Blockchain-based transactions
These cases are highly technical and often rely on evolving legal theories.
Business and Real Estate Transactions
Prosecutors are scrutinizing complex financial structures, especially those that involve:
- Layered business entities
- Cross-border transfers
- High-value property purchases
Defense Strategies to Challenge Asset Forfeiture
To defend against money laundering charges, a defense attorney must address both the forfeiture action and criminal allegations. This may require:
- Challenging the Legality of the Seizure. Law enforcement must follow strict procedures when seizing assets. If those procedures are not followed, the seizure may be invalid.
- Disputing the Connection to Criminal Activity. The government must prove that the assets are linked to unlawful conduct. In many cases, this connection is based on assumptions that can be challenged through financial analysis.
- Asserting an Innocent Owner Defense. If you were unaware of any alleged wrongdoing, you may be able to assert an innocent owner defense. This is particularly important in cases involving shared property or business interests.
- Exposing Weaknesses in Financial Evidence. Money laundering cases often rely on complex financial records. A detailed review may reveal legitimate sources of funds, misinterpretations of transactions by prosecutors, and gaps in the government’s analysis.
Why Early Action Is So Important
Time is not on your side when the government is trying to seize your assets. Early legal intervention allows your defense team to:
- Challenge seizures before assets are permanently forfeited
- Preserve financial resources needed for your defense
- Engage with investigators before charges escalate
- Develop a proactive strategy
Protecting Your Rights and Your Future
Facing money laundering allegations and the loss of your assets simultaneously dramatically increases the stakes. A strong defense is not just about avoiding conviction; it is about protecting everything you have worked to create.
You have the right to challenge:
- The legality of the investigation
- The evidence linking your assets to alleged conduct
- The government’s interpretation of financial transactions
Speak With an Experienced Money Laundering Defense Lawyer in Los Angeles
If you are facing money asset forfeiture and money laundering charges in Los Angeles, you need a defense strategy that addresses both the criminal case and the threat to your assets. Werksman Jackson & Quinn LLP is prepared to act quickly to challenge unlawful seizures, protect your financial interests, and build a strong defense on your behalf.
Our attorneys include former prosecutors who understand how these cases are constructed, and we know how to dismantle them.
Do not wait to take control of your situation. Call (213) 688-0460 today to schedule a confidential consultation and begin protecting your future.
FAQs About Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Charges
What is the difference between criminal forfeiture and civil forfeiture in Los Angeles?
Criminal forfeiture is part of a criminal case. It requires a conviction before assets are permanently taken, while civil forfeiture is a separate legal action against the property itself and does not require a conviction.
Can the government seize assets before I am convicted of money laundering?
Yes. In many cases, law enforcement can seize or freeze assets early in an investigation if they believe the property is connected to unlawful activity. This is why it is critical to act quickly to challenge the seizure and protect your rights.
What types of assets can be seized in money laundering cases?
Authorities may target a wide range of assets, including cash, bank accounts, real estate, vehicles, business interests, and cryptocurrency. Any property alleged to be connected to or derived from unlawful activity may be subject to forfeiture.
How can I defend against money laundering charges and asset forfeiture?
Defense strategies may include challenging the legality of the seizure, disputing the connection between the assets and alleged criminal activity, and asserting an innocent owner defense. An experienced attorney can also identify procedural errors and weaknesses in the government’s case.
Contact Us
“We can handle any criminal case.
Anywhere. Anytime.”
What Our Clients Say
Previous Testimonial Next Testimonial- “Alan Jackson is hands down the best attorney we have worked with. Extremely professional, well liked in the court system and respected amongst all legal professionals. Took our calls at any given time and made himself available all the time.” - S.F. From Google Reviews
- “Perpetually impressed by the professionalism, thoroughness, follow through, and expertise that Mark Werksman, his fellow partners, and associates / admin staff all produce whenever I interact with them, professionally.” - Dru S.
- “Kelly is a brainiac. She's a certified criminal law appellate specialist - a rare achievement and qualification- and she fits into a very unique niche in criminal law. Her primary role at her firm (one of, if not THE best criminal defense firm in los angeles) is research and writer...” - Joseph W.
- “Having Alan Jackson as my lead attorney on 3 separate cases (one felony, and two misdemeanors) was the best decision of my life. I was facing 6-8 years in prison, and he was able to have all three charges dismissed. He's got the skills, connections, and the charisma to aid anyone in any situation...” - Anonymous